In
barely a month, sovereign debt with negative yields has spiked by 12.5%
from $10.4 trillion to $11.7 trillion! [updated: I revised growth figures to reflect the numbers below]
Here
is the updated report from Fitch:
(bold mine)
Investors'
flight to safe assets following the UK's EU referendum on June 23
pushed the global total of sovereign debt with negative
yields to $11.7 trillion as of June 27, up $1.3 trillion from the
end-May total,
according to new analysis by Fitch Ratings. Brexit-related concerns
drove more long-dated bond yields negative, with particularly big
shifts in German, French and Japanese yield curves during June.
Worries over the global growth outlook, further fueled by Brexit, have continued to support demand for higher-quality sovereign paper in June. Widespread adoption of unconventional monetary policies, including large-scale bond-buying programs and negative deposit rates, have driven the large increases in negative-yielding debt seen this year…
The biggest drivers of the total increase during June were seen in longer-dated bonds. For example, German 10-year bund yields swung into negative territory and sub-zero yields moved further out on the curve for Japan -- now out to 17 years. Also, in Switzerland, virtually all sovereign debt carried a negative yield on June 27.
Japanese
government bonds (JGBs) continue to represent
about two-thirds of the global total ($7.9 trillion), while Germany
and France each now have over $1 trillion in sovereign debt with
sub-zero yields. Japan's negative-yielding debt total grew by about
18% during the month, while Germany and France's total grew by 8% and
13%, respectively.
European negative-yielding debt increases were offset in part by an
approximately $0.2 trillion reduction in the Italian total since May
31. This likely reflected investor risk aversion related to Italy
leading up to and following the Brexit referendum.
The spread of negative yields into longer-dated paper was particularly evident in June. A total of $2.6 trillion in sovereign bonds with maturities of seven years or more now trade at a negative yield. This compares with the end-April total of $1.4 trillion.
The spread of negative yields into longer-dated paper was particularly evident in June. A total of $2.6 trillion in sovereign bonds with maturities of seven years or more now trade at a negative yield. This compares with the end-April total of $1.4 trillion.
The increasing amount of long-term negative-yielding debt underscores the challenges faced by large bond investors such as insurance companies that need to match long-term liabilities with similar maturity assets. As more of the global universe of safe assets drops into negative-yielding territory, income for these investors continues to fall.
Here
is what I wrote last June
14:
This
means that instead of borrowers paying lenders for the privileged to
access someone else’s or the lender’s savings, negative yields
means lenders are paying borrowers to borrow! Of
course under the fractional reserve banking, lending is not a
function of someone else's savings but from the central bank's
digital press.
Even
more, any entity that owns a negative yielding instrument
is guaranteed of
losses.
So the broadening of negative yields simply means that losses in the
financial and economic system has been mounting! And
all these for the sake of holding onto liquid instruments that
ensures of the financing of spendthrift governments around the
world.
Think
of what this will do to financial institutions, which are required to
hold government debt as part of their Tier 1 Capital.
And
think of what this will do to pension and insurance funds. In order
to match assets with liabilities these institutions are being forced
out into the financial markets to gamble. And the yoke of the
attendant risks from such speculative activities will be shouldered
by depositors and pension beneficiaries…and eventually taxpayers
and currency holders
Notice
that Brexit has only aggravated the spreading of negative yielding
bonds yields.
The
real reason for such dynamic has been Negative Real Rates Policy (NIRP).
And
notice too that bonds with a negative yield carry have been spreading
faster than the growth in the government’s debt stock at $58 trillion as of 2Q 2014 based on McKinsey Global's estimates. This should
be around close to $70 trillion today.
Uncharted
here has been the concerted sharp flattening of the yield curves of developed
economies in conjunction with negative yields.
Again,
aside from mounting systemic losses and the increasing difficulties (growing imbalances) to match asset-liability gaps in balance sheets, the other outcome will be to deter
credit activities which consequently should translate to further
depletion of systemic liquidity. That’s aside from, to reiterate, losses
being incurred by financial institutions. All these just to save the
debt plagued governments.
The
post-Brexit rally has hardly improved Japan’s Topix Banking Index, which has been drifting at a 3 year low
Stocks
of Europe’s banks have currently been treading at 2008 crisis
levels. A break below 2008 levels should ring alarm bells of a global banking crisis.
The
world is complexly interconnected.
While the US still operates on positive
yield, exogenous developments from NIRP seem to have diffused into the US.
Of
course, internal dynamics from zero bound also plays a big factor.
So
despite the furious two day rally in the equities, such has hardly diminish the reality that US bank stocks
have been undergoing tremendous pressures!
And
banking strains have been spreading too. This has been manifested in the Broker Dealer and
Insurance indices
Add
to these several more ominous writings on the wall: increasing
incidences of global market crashes and magnified volatility (since
2013), the ongoing deepening anomalies in wholesale finance, the
Chinese yuan's weakening, the US dollar strength, slowing global
economy, swelling accounts of nationalism which may bring about
heightened risks of protectionism and which subsequently means reduced
social mobility and capital controls, intensifying geopolitical risks
and more.
How
much more pressures can the world absorb before the system becomes
unglued?
No comments:
Post a Comment