Showing posts with label secession. Show all posts
Showing posts with label secession. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

The Four Horsemen of Financial Market Armageddon? European (Italian) and Japanese Banks, UK Property, Brexit and the Chinese Yuan

Looks as if Risk OFF has returned!

First horseman. Yesterday 3 UK property firms announced that they have suspended investor redemption on their funds.

From CNBC:

The news that Standard Life, Aviva and M&G Investments have suspended dealing in their U.K. property funds has both investors and fund managers worried about the consequences on the broader sector.

Shares of Standard Life were down nearly 5 percent on Tuesday. Meanwhile, shares across other asset management companies were sharply negative too. Aberdeen Asset Management saw its shares down nearly 8 percent, while Schroders was down nearly 6 percent. 

Standard Life was the first to announce suspension on Monday. Aviva Investors and M&G Investments followed the lead to announce a temporary suspension on Tuesday. All three companies have attributed the decision to a massive increase in investor redemptions because of high levels of uncertainty in the U.K. commercial property since the outcome of the referendum on June 23. 

While all three companies have claimed that the decision was taken in order to protect the interests of investors who may be negatively impacted by this, the fear that this may be followed by more property funds has started to worry many.
Second horseman. Pressures on European banks led by Italy has exacerbated:

From CNBC

Italy's bank bailout fund might not be enough to beat back the Brexit. More key Italian financial services firms are under pressure and face the potential need to raise capital, leaving Italian government officials and its banking system trying to steer clear of a crisis. 


As Italian bank bonds and share prices are seeing their value slammed in the face of rising uncertainty, banks with substantial bad loans are facing greater pressure, with rates around the world slipping into negative territory. It's an anxiety some in Italy and throughout the European Union may have been hoping would be eased by the Brexit vote last month — but then the U.K. referendum delivered the opposite outcome from the one they had sought….


Many banks in Italy, including its largest, UniCredit SpA, have seen share prices pounded; its stock is down more than 60 percent so far this year. A staffer at UniCredit could not provide comment when contacted.



Already, Italian officials and executives appear to be pulling out all the stops to stave off banking sector contagion. The lingering question for banks is whether they can continue to support lending operations at a time when creditors face potential losses and as some of the country's leading financial services firms could be subject to shotgun M&A marriages by regulators.

Chart from Zero Hedge

It's not just Italian banks, Europe's banks have been crushed! 


The collapse in Europe's Stoxx banking index was followed up with yesterday's 2.73% meltdown.  

The bank index now approaches the European crisis low. Systemic risks banks Deutsche bank, Credit Suisse and HSBC holdings were slammed by 3.67%, 5.52% and 3.29% last night

Has the European banking crisis returned?

And it has not just been European banks, as yields of Japanese bonds crash deep into record negative zone, Japan’s banks appear to be taking it to the chin!

 

Note the Topix bank still trades at the moment. So the above represents the momentary quote

For the third horseman. Will Europe’s and Italy’s banking problem exacerbate the disintegration of the EU?

One analyst thinks so.

From CNBC

The problems facing the Italian banks could cause Italy to become the next country to try to leave the European Union, strategist Brian Jacobsen said Tuesday. 



That's because many Italian banks may need to raise more capital and European Union banking regulations won't allow recapitalization.



And that could hit the wallets of Italian retail investors, many of whom hold bank bonds, he told CNBC's "Power Lunch."



"The bigger issue here [is] the fact that you have so many pensioners and depositors who have purchased some of the slightly higher-yielding securities issued by Italian banks, who by EU rules would effectively need to be wiped out before there could be a recapitalization," said Jacobsen, chief portfolio strategist at Wells Fargo Funds.
Looks like JM Keynes’ observation of the destructive effects of inflationism—Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency—have become apparent: worsening economic conditions compounded by a potential banking crisis prompted by central bank inflationism may accelerate the EU’s demise and magnify global political risks

So from Brexit to Italexit?



For the fourth horseman, the offshore yuan has significantly dropped for the past two days! The USD-CNH (offshore yuan) has already breached, as of this writing, the January 2016 highs!

It seems that not only one, but four major deflationary forces have now combined to produce a lethal cocktail mix that now serves as structural headwind or nasty unintended consequences to the previous inflationary (invisible transfers) booms brought about by central bank policies. 

Has market forces taken over? Has the moment of reckoning arrived?

Sunday, June 26, 2016

Brexit Represents Another Pin to the Gargantuan Global Financial Bubble and Exposes on Central Bank’s Existential Crisis

Volcanic Tremors: Escalating Signs of Market Crashes and Volatilities!

If you haven’t noticed, there have been three major tremblors that have hit global financial markets in a span of almost just a year. Let me repeat three events in ONE year!

First was in August 2015 (this was blamed to China’s weakening yuan), the second was in January 2016 (also blamed on yuan and on oil price weakness) and the seeming third would represent last Friday’s Brexit inspired selloff.


Or haven’t you noticed of the growing frequency and intensity of tremors that has been afflicting global financial markets?

Well, one way of predicting volcanic eruption is to identify what they call as “harmonic tremors” or a series of minor earthquakes (or an increase in pressures within the system) that serves as precursor to a major eruption.

So if I am not mistaken, given the amplifying frequency and intensities of market turmoil, the real thing—the equivalent of a major financial eruption—may not be so far ahead.

As I recently wrote, the increasing incidences of market crashes (since 2013), the ongoing deepening strains in wholesale finance, the $10 trillion+ and growing negative yielding bond markets, sustained crashing of European-Japanese banking stocks, the Chinese yuan's weakening, US dollar strength and more, all combine to look like preliminary manifestations of "volcanic or harmonic tremors" in motion, only that these applies to the sphere of the global financial markets.

And Brexit could just be the one of the probable spark. Or Brexit could be one of the aggravating factors that will contribute to an eventual financial market eruption soon.

Brexit: Another Pin to the Gargantuan Global Financial Bubble

My late Dad used to lecture me that I should develop a keen sense of observation. Well, unless I am missing something, predicting earthquakes and predicting financial catastrophe may have similarities. Besides, as noted above, there are many fundamental and market footprints that has been pointing at such direction.

Just take a look at how central banks and financial authorities responded to Brexit. Central banks have essentially panicked!

Central banks of India and Korea reportedly intervened in their respective currency markets last Friday, in support of their currencies. The Swiss central bank, the SNB, admitted to their fx interventions while Norway’s central bank injected $1.6 billion in liquidity in their financial system. The US Federal Reserve (offered swap lines), UK’s Bank of England, the Bank of Japan, the ECB, the People’s Bank of China and the Swedish Central Bank all said that they are ready to adapt measures necessary to ensure liquidity.

The G-7 announced that their central banks “have taken steps to ensure adequate liquidity and to support the functioning of markets. We stand ready to use the established liquidity instruments to that end.”

In short, global central banks have already launched a massive tsunami of stimulus to forestall Friday’s black swan…yet these measures has initially failed to calm the markets.

But why shouldn’t it fail?

At the week’s inception, global markets have essentially powered significantly higher in anticipation of a status quo through the expected victory by the “remain” camp. Such optimism had mainly been based on misleading (or perhaps manipulative) polls and bookies odds.

In other words, the financial market consensus bought hook line and sinker the political kool aid which served as motivation to spike the markets up. Or Bremain was seen as having entrenched the establishment’s position.

Yet the portrayed factitious relationship was majestically debunked! Financial markets didn’t represent the majority! Or England’s majority voted against the establishment’s interests!

Thus massive trade and arbitrage positions that had been built on this one way trade had to be unwound…violently!

In essence, the mirage of asset inflation through central bank policies of invisible wealth redistribution to the establishment institutions was exposed as the emperor with no clothes.

Brexit served as another pin to have popped the humungous global asset bubbles that have been spawned, fostered and nurtured by central bankers. 

While central banks have inflated asset prices, they cannot manipulate people in perpetuity. Such policies have only been widening the wedge between centralized political institutions benefiting from such policies and the average people. Hence, the backlash from invisible wealth transfers has virtually hit a critical inflection point!

Brexit Exposes Central Bank’s Existential Crisis

The priest of inflationism John Maynard Keynes once presciently wrote,

By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security but [also] at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth.

Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become "profiteers," who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat. As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.

Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose. 

ZIRP, QE and NIRP has essentially represented “all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.”

Asset inflation, which has been signified as the principal channel of central bank policies, have turned financial markets into a “process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble”

And because such “process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction” even when “not one man in a million is able to diagnose”, the indirect and incremental devastation of the real economy through its various symptoms (inequality, Middle East wars, refugees, sclerotic economies, mounting debt burdens, systematic excess capacities on bubble sectors, stagnant wages, and more) which has incited on the “overturning the existing basis of society” has now boomeranged.

Brexit and its potential domino effect or contagion will likewise expose on the latent fragilities brought about by central bank policies.

For instance, Italy’s debt crisis will unravel again when bids on Italy’s bonds dissipate. Importantly, any further “exits” from EU will further undermine the ECB’s ability to conduct its monetary policies. Such would magnify debt problems of crisis afflicted nations as Italy. 

As analyst David Stockman explained

Since Italy owes upward of $2 trillion on it government accounts alone, its bond market is an explosion waiting to happen. And that means its bedraggled banks are, too.

That’s because one feature of the Draghi Ponzi was that national banks in the peripheral nations started buying up their own country’s rapidly appreciating sovereign debt hand-over-fist. Italy’s banks own upwards of $400 billion of Italian government debt.

That’s the one and same Italian government that cannot possibly cope with its existing 135% debt to GDP ratio. And that’s also before the populists take power and are forced to bailout the country’s already insolvent banking system. The latter will suffer from a shock of capital and depositor flight after the current government falls(soon), and Prime Minister Renzi joins Cameron and Rajoy at some establishment rehab center for the deposed.

In short, Brexit and the political risks from further dilution pose as an EXISTENTIAL crisis not only for the EU but importantly for the European Central Bank. This would also present as a clear and present danger for central bank policies around the world as the political economic and financial infrastructure that has underpinned the current policy transmission mechanism will likely undergo radical changes.

What is Unsustainable Won’t Last

Some may deny to say that a day’s event may not signify a trend. Well, while this may partly true, such perspective in essence would redound to a reckless dismissal of swelling signs of impending disaster. Just think of a dam whose walls have been affected by spreading of cracks and crevices through increased leakages. Brexit is just one of them.

And of course, expect the establishment to fight tooth and nail to keep retain the status quo. Aside from a tsunami of stimulus of global central banks, some segments of the British population have already pushed for second referendum.

Besides, Brexit is bound to happen. As I wrote in 2012:

In reality, EU’s economic integration serves merely a cover for covert plans to establish political fantasyland. Eventually the path towards centralization will lead to unnecessary violence and the self-implosion of an unsustainable and unviable political system

Also in another of my Prudent Investor blog post in the same year:

Yet political solutions (bank and sovereign bailouts, ECB’s interventions, surging regulations, higher taxes and etc…) will not only hamper economic recovery, they will lead to more social frictions which increases the risks of the EU’s disunion—as evidenced by the snowballing secession movements—and of the escalation of violence.

Finally, financial math indicates that what is unsustainable will have to end.

Interviewed by the Mises Institute, Godfrey Bloom, a British politician who served as a Member of the European Parliament(MEP) for Yorkshire and the Humber from 2004 to 2014 has this foreboding revelation: (bold mine)

The ECB is broke 3 trillion pounds. The Germans have 900 billion pounds owed to them by shadow banking. The ECB are buying 80 billion pounds worth of junk bonds every month. They’ve already bought something like 380 billion. You simply can’t go on like this forever and our own government in the UK and nobody’s talking about this, Jeff. Nobody is talking about this. We are the second most indebted nation in the world after Japan and I see pundits talking about our debt being 80% of the GDP, but they’re not taking into consideration unfunded public pensions and public funding initiatives which have been running for about 10 years. If you take everything into consideration and of course, the businessman listening to the cast, will know that if you leave off international accounting standards, your liability for your pension fund and anything else, it’s illegal, it’s a criminal offense and you’d go to prison. It doesn’t really matter what we vote on Thursday. The clock is ticking and the whole thing will collapse in a few years.

In the movie series the Matrix, the Oracle counseled on the leading character Neo on how to beat his opponent,

Everything that has a beginning has an end

 

 

Saturday, June 25, 2016

Infographics:Is Brexit the First of Many Dominoes?

The Visual Capitalist presents the probable Brexit dominoes. 

[Let me add that the rush for decentralization or break/secession from the EU will likely entail heightened nationalism. This means greater risk of protectionism. And increased adaption of protectionism will likely be accompanied by regional tensions. Brexit shows that the adjustment process won't be smooth sailing]
Is Brexit the First of Many Dominoes?

UK AND THE REST OF EUROPE BRACE FOR AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE

Markets have been turned upside down by a surprise Brexit result and the resignation of David Cameron. While there is looming uncertainty around how this will affect the United Kingdom and Europe from an economic perspective, it might be just the tip of the iceberg in terms of long-run consequences.

A Brexit opens the door for future events that would be previously unfathomable by popular opinion, and it gives vital ammunition to groups that are seeking their own referendums for independence.

UNWILLING PASSENGERS?

As the UK ship distances itself from European docks, there are two passengers that may have been more comfortable remaining on shore.

While England and Wales voted to “Leave” with 53.4% and 52.5% respectively, Scotland and Northern Ireland were both firmly in “Remain” territory. Scotland, which previously held its own independence referendum in 2014, voted overwhelmingly to have the UK remain in the EU with a 62% vote. Northern Ireland had a similar sentiment with 55.8% voting “Remain”.

Scotland’s First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, said today that a second independence referendum for Scotland is “highly likely”. She feels Scotland was taken out of the EU against its own will, and that Scottish independence is worth revisiting.

Meanwhile, Northern Ireland has echoed these calls, instead potentially looking at voting on a united Ireland. Northern Ireland is the only country in the UK that shares a land border with a country in the EU.

OTHER DOMINOES

The Brexit result has energized other populist movements across the European Union. Anti-immigration leaders such as Geert Wilders and Marine Le Pen have ratcheted up cries for their own independence votes:

However, it is not just people on the fringe that are interested in revisiting EU membership. Even before the Brexit result, a poll by Ipsos Mori showed that the majority of people in France in Italy want to at least have a referendum on leaving:


Meanwhile, over 40% of Swedes, Poles, and Belgians are in the same boat.

Now that Brexit is a thing, will these numbers trend higher? What will be the next domino to fall?
Courtesy of: Visual Capitalist

Friday, June 24, 2016

Brexit: Bookies and Polls Got It Wrong, Forces of Decentralization Gains A Pivotal Upper Hand

The British has decided to divorce the EU.  

This represents the final result


Well, polls were mostly wrong in predicting Brexit


And so were the bookies…

A Telegraph quote lifted from the Zero Hedge.
Paddy Power has announced Remain has a 93% chance of success in the EU referendum vote after a flood of last minute bets were placed on the In campaign.

Stephanie Anderson, Politics Trader at Paddy Power said: “After opening the day at 1/3 we’ve had no choice but to cut REMAIN into 1/12 this morning after a constant stream of money.

"Punters have been waiting until the day of the vote to part with their cash and REMAIN is all they’re interested in. As a direct result LEAVE has drifted out to 7/1 and that could move out even further as the day goes on.”

Paddy Power has seen £500k bet on Remain in the past five days  including more than ten five-figure bets.

It makes the EU Referendum the biggest political betting event on record with British bookmakers on course to take £100m.


Dr Pippa Malmgrem explained on her tweet the anomaly in bookie odds or the prediction markets. Apparently it is the currency bets rather vote per head that skewed the skewed the betting in favor of “remain”.

Curiously, a major Brexit proponent, Nigel Farage, almost conceded to Brexit’s defeat simply based on survey and initial vote counting results. Later Mr Farage backed down and reversed course.

Of course, the surveys may not be entirely wrong. That’s if these were deliberately done to create a bandwagon effect or to manipulate voter’s preferences.

Nevertheless, Brexit was a victory for decentralization and the defeat of establishment politics.

While I expected the establishment to pull a magic to secure a win for the “remain” camp, apparently it didn’t happen. 

Nevertheless, it is a dynamic that has been fated to occur.

I wrote in March 2012

In reality, EU’s economic integration serves merely a cover for covert plans to establish political fantasyland. Eventually the path towards centralization will lead to unnecessary violence and the self-implosion of an unsustainable and unviable political system

If people in Brussels hold economic integration as their primary goal, then all they should do is voluntarily drop their political ambitions and allow the individual market economies in Europe to flourish with little or no political baggage attached.

But of course, this would mean that EU bureaucrats would be out of jobs and vested interest groups would lose their politically endowed privileges.

In November 2012 I predicted:

Yet political solutions (bank and sovereign bailouts, ECB’s interventions, surging regulations, higher taxes and etc…) will not only hamper economic recovery, they will lead to more social frictions which increases the risks of the EU’s disunion—as evidenced by the snowballing secession movements—and of the escalation of violence.

And the Brexit contagion has begun: voters in Italy, France and Netherland now also want their own referendum.

These are very bad developments for highly leverage undercapitalized EU banks (which of course would most likely have a domino effect on the world).





Stagflation Part 16: The Peso's 24th Record Low — When the Pressure Valve Widens

    Modern democracy and bureaucracy progressively separate decision-makers from the costs and feedback generated by their decisions. Democr...