Showing posts with label boom bust cycle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label boom bust cycle. Show all posts

Sunday, October 11, 2026

Whac-a-Mole Economics: The Week the Philippine Financial Markets Cracked

  

There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved—Ludwig von Mises 

In this issue: 

Whac-a-Mole Economics: The Week the Philippine Financial Markets Cracked

I. The Peso and Bonds Send the Bill

II. Intervention Meets Its Limits

III. When Liquidity Loses Its Punch

IV. Whac-a-Mole Is a Displacement Mechanism

V. The PSEi’s Engineered Pumps Amidst Worsening Breadth

VI. Conclusion: Cracks in the Feedback Loop, The Bursting Bubble in Motion 

Whac-a-Mole Economics: The Week the Philippine Financial Markets Cracked 

The peso broke records, sovereign yields broke out, and the PSEi needed another round of mechanical props. 


Figure 1
 

There is little appreciation of how eventful this week was for Philippine financial markets. Three pressure points flashed warning signals almost simultaneously: the peso, government bonds, and equities. (Figure 1, upper window) 

I. The Peso and Bonds Send the Bill 

USDPHP hit a record 62.90 on Thursday and closed Friday at 62.801. It was the 26th record-high milestone of 2026. As the records multiply, day-on-day changes have compressed while volume has remained moderate. (Figure 1, lower image) 

A market discovering a price produces wider ranges as it travels. A market being walked produces tight ranges at each new level. The pattern is consistent with managed price adjustment. Simply put, this is intervention.


Figure 2 

September 2026's GIR figures—$100 billion, a three year low—offer another clue to the cost of that management: The BSP’s FX policy regime is eroding. (Figure 2, topmost pane) 

Meanwhile, most of the BVAL yield curve broke its April–May 2026 peak, into multi-year highs. The 20- and 25-year yields surged 69.26 and 70.38 basis points for the week. (Figure 2, middle visual) 

Treasury bills jumped too: 36.31 bps for one month, 24.03 bps for three months, and 26.72 bps for six months. Intermediate maturities, from one to seven years, rose by 5.11 to 25.03 bps. 

Each cluster prices a different risk. The belly prices inflation. The bills price a BSP that will have to follow with hikes. (Figure 2, lowest graph) 

The 20-to-25-year sector must be held by someone willing to carry duration with no policy backstop, so it is the market price of fiscal credibility. 

The ten-year yield slipped below 8% on Friday to 7.8737%, but remained above its May 20 high of 7.8094%. The 20- and 25-year yields, at 8.1976% and 8.2003%, are well past their recent highs. The pattern points to bearish steepening, driven primarily by the long end. 

Essentially, the long end prices the state itself: expected inflation, future financing needs, and the premium investors demand to carry sovereign duration


Figure 3
 

The thin market is part of the finding, not an excuse for it. Daily Treasury turnover has been weakening with daily turnover headed toward 2024 levels. (Figure 3, upper diagram) 

September's PDS-reported volume of Php 613.8 billion was the lowest of 2026, below the 2024 monthly average. Simply put, yields rose even as turnover fell or mounting losses have led to reduced transactions. This is also a sign of the corrosion of savings. 

Notwithstanding, the timing is awkward for the BSP's J.P. Morgan emerging-market bond inclusion plan. Peso-denominated government and corporate bonds will adopt international pricing conventions for settlement effective January 4, 2027. The plumbing is being built just as bond prices fall at home and abroad. Amazing. 

Leave no doubt, better infrastructure does not mechanically buy better prices. 

The bond vigilantes need not stage a rebellion. They only need to charge more for financing the state. 

II. Intervention Meets Its Limits 

The convenient explanations are already available: fare hikes, September's 7.2% CPI, the August employment bounce, elevated oil prices, foreign bond vigilantes, and September's second-largest GIR decline of the year, driven by other reserve assets (ORA) and gold. 

These matter. But they are triggers and symptoms, not the entire panorama. 

But the most critical force—the unseen—is the domestic ledger. 

Global rates set the tide; they do not determine the entire slope of a local yield curve, because the slope is where local risk resides. 

With Q3 closed, quarter-end spending and financing requirements add to a fiscal position already burdened by record debt and twin deficits, as discussed in Stagflation Part 17. 

The bond’s long end is reading the domestic ledger. 

III. When Liquidity Loses Its Punch 

The credit market offers another clue. Philippine sovereign CDS—the cost of insuring against sovereign default—registered Asia's largest weekly widening as of October 8, according to ADB's AsianBondsOnline data, while Indonesia and Vietnam moved in mixed directions. (Figure 3, lower chart) 


Figure 4 

The bond market tells the same story. 

The Iran war’s oil shock helped push the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield above 5.3%, before it retreated to 5.24% by this week’s close (October 9th). Yet ASEAN’s 10-year yields were comparatively subdued—except the Philippines, which crossed 8% on October 8. (Figure 4, upper image) 

More significantly, the Bloomberg reported last week that Philippine bonds were the worst-performing in emerging markets since the Iran war began, losing 13% in dollar terms across an index tracking 19 emerging markets. (Figure 4, lower diagram)

To repeat, worst performing. 

The 10-year yield's surge, the peso's slide, and the widening CDS spread are converging signals of Philippine-specific stress—not merely collateral damage from global tightening. 

The Philippines is becoming an outlier in both sovereign credit risk and bond performance. 

Think about what has actually been happening. 

Global tightening is not transmitted evenly: the weakest links feel it first. As liquidity's marginal effects diminish, the periphery begins to crack, potentially transmitting stress toward the core. 

This is the reverse Cantillon effect—liquidity withdrawal exposing the malinvestments and the most fragile balance sheets first that easy money had kept afloat. 

Financial structures built around cheap liquidity do not adjust painlessly when that regime changes. 

What looks like isolated market weakness may be structural unwinding—a clearing phase for malinvestments, not merely another market event. 

IV. Whac-a-Mole Is a Displacement Mechanism 

When the sustained widening savings-investment gap is papered over with administered prices, relief measures, and managed FX, the adjustment does not vanish. 

It relocates to the next weakest valve. 

Suppress CPI and the pressure shows up in the peso. Lean on the peso and it shows up in yields. Prop the yields and it shows up in equities. This week all three showed it at once. 

V. The PSEi’s Engineered Pumps Amidst Worsening Breadth 

Monday's (October 5) low-volume pump lifted the PSEi by 2.03%. The record-low peso and yield breakout then coincided with a 2.2% plunge on Thursday, bringing the index within reach of its November 14, 2025 low of 5,584. Note that this low came amidst stable yields.


Figure 5

Friday’s 1.6% rebound came from the same post-recess “afternoon delight” seen pattern seen last Monday and Thursday with ICTSI supplying a third of the day’s gain and a pre-close dump once again. (Figure 5, topmost window) 

For the week, the index closed up 1.28%, or 71.96 points, with SM, AC, and MER contributing about 58.4% of the gain. (Figure 5, middle graph) 

The index's 18–12 breadth contrasted with PSE-wide breadth of 431 advancers to 484 decliners, extending the deterioration in broader participation for a fifth week. (Figure 5, lowest diagram) 

Average daily Main Board volume fell 23.23%, from Php 5.95 billion to Php 4.57 billion 

The benchmark rose. Participation weakened. 

An index lifted by three names, against a falling-volume, seller-leaning market, measures the headlines, not the economy. 

Hayek's insight on dispersed knowledge applies. Prices are supposed to compress information held by millions of participants. 

When benchmark mechanics steer attention and capital, the price reflects index-driven flows instead of entrepreneurial discovery, and the exchange’s allocative function degrades. 

Figaro Culinary's planned delisting is the latest symptom. It joins the broader pattern of departures and proposed exits, including Asian Terminals, City & Land Developers, Robinsons Retail, and MerryMart.


Figure 6 

This helps explain why the PSEi remains one of Asia's laggards despite years of easy money, why the PSE’s active investor participation has strikingly weakened, and why delistings keep accumulating. (Figure 6, upper window) 

Capital markets should connect savings to productive investment, MSMEs included. Instead, the incumbent policy environment skews the playing field toward politically connected oligarchic interests. 

VI. Conclusion: Cracks in the Feedback Loop, the Bursting Bubble in Motion 

The PSEi’s relationship with 10-year government bond yields is more than a chart pattern. (Figure 6, lower chart) 

Rising yields raise the discount rate applied to future earnings, increase financing costs, and make equities less attractive relative to fixed-income alternatives. 

But the transmission runs both ways: sovereign stress also affects bank balance sheets, credit allocation, and the economy underpinning corporate earnings. 

The peso, bonds, and equities are entwined through financing costs, bank balance sheets, capital allocation, and purchasing power. 

Higher yields penalize the heavily indebted: the government, conglomerates, and banks financing both. 

  • Currency weakness raises imported-energy, food and manufacturing costs. 
  • Inflation squeezes real incomes, while slower economic growth makes debt service harder. 
  • Banks are not detached observers of fiscal stress; as counterparties, they are among its primary transmission channels. 

Once again, as liquidity tightens, the weakest links are exposed first. Stress can then travel from the periphery toward the financial system's core, threatening structures built around years of cheap money. 

An engineered rebound can restore certain index level/s. It cannot restore purchasing power, erase debt, or manufacture the savings investment requires. 

The Whac-a-Mole game continues. The problem is that the moles are connected, and the mallet is getting heavier. 

This is the bursting bubble in motion. 


Monday, February 12, 2024

Deciphering Conflicting Data: Record Philippine December Employment Rate, January 2024 CPI Plunge, and Q4 GDP’s Slowing Consumer Spending

  

Economists provide forecasts not because they know, but because they are asked to by clients or employers. The payoff structure is unusual. Forecasting’s key performance indicator is relative rather than absolute. This means an economist’s forecasts tend to cluster around a point with few if any outliers. As John Kenneth Galbraith held: “It is far, far safer to be wrong with the majority than to be right alone.”—Satyajit Das

 

In this issue:

Deciphering Conflicting Data: Record Philippine December Employment Rate, January 2024 CPI Plunge, and Q4 GDP’s Slowing Consumer Spending

I. A Goldilocks Economy? Record December Employment Rate and Plunge in January CPI; Not the Phillips Curve

II. Widening Divergence between the CPI, Treasury Market Rates and BSP Monetary Policy

III. Disinflation: Supply Side Glut?

IV. Disinflation: Slack in Demand Despite BSP’s Backdoor Easing?

V. Record Employment Rate? Why the Slowing per Capita Headline GDP and Household Consumption?

 

Deciphering Conflicting Data: Record Philippine December Employment Rate, January 2024 CPI Plunge, and Q4 GDP’s Slowing Consumer Spending

 

Is the mounting mismatch between record employment and sharp disinflation fueled by demand or supply? Q4 2023GDP provides a clue.

 

I. A Goldilocks Economy? Record December Employment Rate and Plunge in January CPI; Not the Phillips Curve

 

The Philippine Statistics Authority released two critically significant and interdependent economic data.

 

First, it reported a sharp decline in the statistical inflation rate, the CPI, last January.

 

Rappler, February 6: Prices of goods accelerated at a slower pace for the fourth straight month in January, as food prices continued to stabilize. But in a rice-loving country like the Philippines, this downtrend is not easily felt as global prices of the staple coupled with weather concerns have pushed up domestic prices. The Philippine Statistics Authority on Tuesday, February 6, reported that the inflation rate in January eased further to 2.8%, which is well within the government’s target range of 2% to 4%. The latest figure is lower than the 3.9% posted in December 2023, and the 8.7% recorded in January 2023.

 

Next, it published a record uptake in employment, or the nation registered its highest employment rate.

 

Inquirer.net, February 7: The proportion of unemployed Filipinos to total labor force sank to another record-low in the final month of 2023. There were 1.6 million jobless people in December 2023, down from 1.83 million in the preceding month, the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) reported Wednesday. This put the jobless rate rate to 3.1 percent, the lowest since the PSA adopted a new definition of “unemployment” back in 2005. It beat the previous record-low unemployment rate of 3.6 percent recorded in November.

 

Acolytes of the Phillips Curve, the mainstream, could see this as an anomaly. 

 

Named after economist A.W. Phillips, the Phillips Curve represents the inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment, channeled through wages.   "A falling unemployment rate signals an increase in the demand for labor, which puts upward pressure on wages. Profit-maximizing firms then raise the prices of their products in response to rising labor costs," or lower unemployment is associated with higher inflation and vice versa. (Engemann, 2020)

 

Although we are no fan of the Phillips Curve, the recent data paints the tape of a "Goldilocks economy" anchored on an explosion of productivity.

 

Really?

 

II. Widening Divergence between the CPI, Treasury Market Rates and BSP Monetary Policy

 

Figure 1

 

January's CPI has resulted in the widening deviance between the Treasury markets.  (Figure 1, topmost chart)

 

The yields of one-month T-Bills have started to climb instead of falling.   In the meantime, the BSP policy rate (ON-RRP rate) has also reached its broadest differentials with the CPI since 2019.  A series of rate cuts by the BSP followed back then. (Figure 1, middle window)

 

The steep decline in the CPI has widened its gap with the BSP rates, resonating with the 2005-2007 episode.   Will the BSP repeat its panic cuts in 2007? (Figure 1, lowest graph)

 

Figure 2

 

Further, the spread between core CPI and the headline CPI has expanded, revealing the "stickiness" of non-food and non-energy inflation. (Figure 1, topmost chart)

 

This mounting disjointedness could either mean that the BSP's "hawkishness" has influenced the Treasury markets, or the latter could be telegraphing a rebound in inflation.

 

The thing is, market price distortions could result in disorderly adjustments when the economy starts to reflect on the underlying conditions.

 

III. Disinflation: Supply Side Glut?

 

Has the current streak of disinflation emanated from the demand or supply side?

 

The mainstream has programmed the public to believe that the supply side is responsible for the latest episodes of inflation.

 

So, let us explore.

 

Manufacturing Q4 2023 "real" GDP reported a stagnant .6%, the lowest since Q1 2021.  The sector's bank borrowings and the Producer Price Index, which recently drifted into deflationary territory, have indicated such doldrums. (Figure 2, middle diagram)

 

On the other hand, the real GDP imports of goods clocked in a -2.6% in Q4 2023.

 

Capital goods imports reported a -4.6%, +.15%, and 0% growth in the last three months of 2023. (Figure 2, lowest graph)

 

If investments were down, how could the employment rate reach a record high? From local savers?

 

Meanwhile, consumer goods imports grew by 4.8%, 15.4%, and 10.6%, respectively.

 

In a nutshell, consumers have become increasingly dependent on imports, which translates to rising trade deficits.

Figure 3

 

But the PSA also tells us that based on preliminary data, domestic trade plummeted in Q4 2023.

 

Philippine Statistics Authority, February 8: The total quantity of domestic trade in the fourth quarter of 2023 was registered at 3.24 million tons. This represents an annual decrease of 48.6 percent from the 6.31 million tons recorded quantity of domestic trade in the same quarter of 2022. In the third quarter of 2023, the annual decline was reported at 6.4 percent, while in the fourth quarter of 2022, an annual increase of 12.0 percent was recorded. Almost all (99.9%) of the commodities were traded through water (coastwise), while the rest were traded through air in the fourth quarter of 2023…Domestic trade value refers to the outflow value of commodities transported from the region/province of origin to another region/province of destination. The total value of domestic trade in the fourth quarter of 2023 amounted to PhP 137.71 billion. This indicates an annual decrease of 52.4 percent from the PhP 289.57 billion value of domestic trade in the same period of 2022. (bold and italics mine)

 

The PSA doesn't say what caused the sharp dive in domestic trade.   If there had been bottlenecks in shipments and logistics, given a steady demand, prices of goods would have risen.   Last December, the CPI was 3.9% and 4.3% in Q4, down from 4.1% in November and 5.3% in Q3.

 

Briefly, there is little evidence that a supply glut has led to the recent disinflation.

 

IV. Disinflation: Slack in Demand Despite BSP’s Backdoor Easing?

 

How about demand?

 

Unlike the BSP's rate hikes in 2018, which aggravated the slowdown in general bank lending, the Universal-Commercial Bank lending portfolio continues to grow but at a subdued pace.  (Figure 3, middle graph)

 

And though lending to the production side has slowed somewhat, the record growth spike of consumer borrowings—in part from the BSP's interest rate caps and partly from responses to inflation—has partially offset this. (Figure 3, lowest chart)

Figure 4

 

Since the implementation of the subsidies, the domestic banking system's business model has shifted radically to focus on consumer spending. (Figure 4, topmost pane)

 

The CPI has closely tracked salary loans, which bounced off from its recent growth downturn. (Figure 4, middle chart)

 

And so, could the rebound in salary loans have emanated from more jobs?  Salary loans in pesos are at a record high!

 

Add to this the record liquidity injections by banks via the monetization of the government's debt. 

 

Net claims on central government (NCoCG) soared by 14.2% to a record Php 5.19 trillion last December. (Figure 4, lowest pane)

 

Also, the BSP's NCoCG spiked to Php 1.045 trillion.

Figure 5

 

As it happened, while the BSP insists on embracing a "hawkish" stance, the reality is that side policies (subsidies, relief measures, and injections) have led to a rebound in the money supply (M2 and M3) to the GDP ratio. (Figure 5, topmost diagram)


So, liquidity (credit) expands even as the BSP supposedly has been tightening. 

 

Thus, the BSP's rate hikes signify a mirage—tightening for headline consumption only.

 

Should credit growth reaccelerate, despite the high rates, this could lead to a reversal in the present course of disinflation. 

 

Have the Treasury markets been factoring stagflation—slowing growth amidst higher CPI?

 

Moreover, pulling forward consumption via increased leverage translates to lower growth and higher credit risks ahead.


V. Record Employment Rate? Why the Slowing per Capita Headline GDP and Household Consumption?

 

Here is the thing.  The Q4 and 2023 GDP data has incorporated the all-time high in employment rate or the record-low unemployment rate.

 

But, in the face of alleged tightening labor, why have per capita GDP and household consumption been slowing? (Figure 5, middle and lowest graphs)

 

See earlier discussion of the Q4’s slowing consumer here.

 

Figure 6

 

Has this been because the principal industries (trade, finance, real estate, and transport) have seen a slowdown while the job increases have emerged from agriculture, construction, information, and public defense or mostly government and government-related activities?

 

Oddly, the government reported a rebound in manufacturing last December despite the sluggish GDP.

 

If demand has been strong, why the labor retrenchment in the trade industry?

 

Deteriorating quality of labor in the face of increasing quantity?

 

Or, could either one of the data (the CPI and the employment rate) have been inaccurate? Or could both have been defective? Or could the GDP have been wayward from actual conditions? Or, have I been missing anything?

In the end, a glut in the supply seems unlikely.  Despite backdoor easing by the BSP, demand has been insufficient to boost the CPI and the GDP—even with record employment rates. 

Further, demand from unproductive and speculative activities consumes savings and capital, which, therefore, is unsustainable.

 

____

References

Kristie M. Engemann, What Is the Phillips Curve (and Why Has It Flattened)? January 14, 2020, Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis

 

 

Stagflation Part 18: Philippine Banks as Shock Absorber — Record Lending, Record Bonds, Record Hiding Places

     But the boom cannot continue indefinitely. There are two alternatives. Either the banks continue the credit expansion without restricti...